Skip to main content

Practices.

The firm's work, framed for the question that arrives in your role.

Directors are managing the documented AI oversight record their D&O carriers, their counsel, and Delaware's Caremark progeny now expect to see. HR leaders are managing the vendor diligence, notice deployment, and compliance posture Illinois HB 3773 made strict-liability work on January 1. The questions are different, the documentation is different, and the conversations are happening in different rooms. Each practice is the firm's engagements, published references, and diagnostic tools assembled for one of these audiences.

What's in each practice.

BoardSight AI. The AI Governance & D&O Liability briefing, the Caremark and AI Oversight reference, and the engagements built around the rhythms of board work — half-day and full-day committee Briefings, the productized Diagnostic that produces a Risk Profile the audit committee can supervise, the Standing Advisor retainer timed to the D&O renewal cadence.

TalentSight. The AI Hiring Vendor Questionnaire, the HR Readiness Checklist, the HB 3773 Compliance Guide, and the engagements built around HR decision cycles — the half-day HB 3773 HR Workshop that produces a 90-day implementation plan, the 3-to-4-week Compliance Review that produces a documented posture, the Multi-Jurisdictional Review for organizations operating across Illinois, California, New York, Colorado, and the EU.

The full list of engagement formats — Diagnostic, Workshop, Review, Briefing, Advisor — is at Engagements.

Where to start.

If you are looking for the practice that fits your role, the two cards above are the entry. If your question is broader — multi-jurisdictional, mixed audience, or undefined — the firm's Diagnostic remains the most common starting point.